On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > JK> I would certainly entertain revisiting this issue. > > I end up rebuilding fedora-release so that I can get rid of the > fedora-release-notes dependency; one less thing I have to customize > would be good (although I still won't be able to get away from > rebuilding fedora-release to use different repositories). Can you explain why you are rebuilding fedora-release? I thought we provided generic-release package so that you don't have to rebuild fedora-release as part of customization. generic-release or anything structured like it in terms of provides, should be a drop in replacement for fedora-release. The only packages which should be explicitly requiring 'fedora-release' instead of 'system-release' are packages which have fedora trademarks. if I were are going to make a custom release package for local use, I'd start with generic-release rename it jef-release and fill it with the repository definitions I care about. Install jef-release, remove fedora-release and then enjoy life. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
