On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:08:04AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> In this case the reviewer clearly said what needs to be fixed and the >>> version which got imported was fixed, so it wasn't that bad. Maybe it >>> would have made more sense to wait for a fixed version, but are there >>> actually any issues with what was imported? >> None that I know of. The package owner told me a different story on IRC >> and I was under the impression that the reviewer did not spot the >> problem. What I said was 'I had a package a approved that had the wrong font in it' and while this wasn't meant as 'The reviewer didn't spot the error' it can easily be understood that way (heck - it's probably very difficult to understand it any other way). By the time we clarified this, Christophs first email was already out. So: It's all my fault and sorry for the noise (of this third of the issues). > Maybe the submitter missed that. (That's a drawback of "fix > before/during/after import please", the issues may end up overlooked. On > the other hand it does save a pointless turnaround in many cases.) I agree - while 'wrong content' sounds like a grave error it actually wasn't as these kind of very simple font packages just include "*.ttf" from the source-zip. Blocking the review for this issue would just have meant another round trip with no added value. So again: Apologies for bringing this up. -- sven === jabber/xmpp: sven@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
