Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:

I'd suggest the tone should be less prescriptive - i.e. not so much "you
must do foo" - and also give some rationale.

e.g. "when preparing your update, consider what the user will see and
how they will decide whether they should apply the update".
I am probably not going to be very good at doing this. Do you want to try?

Okay, here's an attempt:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Markmc/Draft_package_update_guidelines

Thanks. I have made a minor edit making it explicit that this doesn't apply to rawhide or new packages. Looks good to me. I will be sending this over to FESCo (cc'ing Jon Stanley) unless anybody has other specific feedback.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux