Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Julian Sikorski wrote: > > While I'm always trying to be precise in my update notes, I only > > maintain a handful of packages. I can understand how putting verbose > > update notes can be a daunting task. Also, what's the problem of going > > to upstream website to check what changed in 2.16.2? > Problem is finding out such information. It isn't easy at all for end > users to do and sometimes doesn't exist in the upstream website. It > would be very useful if package maintainers spend a little bit more > time including more complete descriptions in the updates. Note that, I > am referring here to description that is part of bodhi update and not > the changelog which can be very brief. The %changelog remains. I'd prefer a decent entry there, and copy that (by default?) here. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
