On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:05 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > Aside from upstream (hopefully) not being a mess, there is a difference > between "this seems to work" and "what justification, besides that > upstream has fixed bugs and added features, can I give to push this update"? > > If a package seems to be non-broken and fixes bugs, that's good enough > for me to update. (Of course, I'm also not in a limited-bandwidth > situation, but...) Just because I haven't been bitten by a particular > bug /yet/ doesn't make updating useless; maybe it saves me from being > bit tomorrow. > > Also, notice I didn't actually object to asking for better "what's > changed" information. I objected to putting bureaucracy in the way of > what Fedora currently is; a distro that tends to closely track upstream. > > > On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 17:29 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> Should we not release any updates without a Fedora bug being filed > >> asking to upgrade to the latest upstream? > > > > That's actually not unreasonable. The update process should be user > > driven, as in a user needs or wants something specific from the new > > upstream code, we don't just install a bot to throw whatever falls out > > of upstream directly at our users whether they want/need it or not. > > ...except now I have to run around opening a ticket every time KDE bumps > its requirement on CMake version, or libical version, or... But Fedora /releases/ aren't your personal rawhide. We're providing releases that are supposed to stay somewhat stable, not to just be a dumping ground for whatever upstream chooses to drop the day before. We have a developmental stream for that, and it makes releases fairly often. I just don't understand why we want to treat our /release/ branches as if they were just another rawhide. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list