On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 17:29 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > Then there are distros that believe in following upstream and shipping > their bug-fixes and feature enhancements. I'm using my favorite one of > those :-). Such distros, incidentally, are great for developers (/me > waves) who need to follow upstream (due to dependencies, or just desire > to watch upstream) but who need something more stable than rawhide. If everybody is just throwing the latest from upstream in whatever the feel like it, what keeps a release from being more stable than rawhide? > > Should we not release any updates without a Fedora bug being filed > asking to upgrade to the latest upstream? That's actually not unreasonable. The update process should be user driven, as in a user needs or wants something specific from the new upstream code, we don't just install a bot to throw whatever falls out of upstream directly at our users whether they want/need it or not. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
