Re: Lack of update information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/26 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> But Fedora /releases/ aren't your personal rawhide.  We're providing
> releases that are supposed to stay somewhat stable, not to just be a
> dumping ground for whatever upstream chooses to drop the day before.  We
> have a developmental stream for that, and it makes releases fairly
> often.  I just don't understand why we want to treat our /release/
> branches as if they were just another rawhide.

I doubt anyone here intentionally treats a release in the same way
it's acceptable to beat up rawhide with.  There's a _huge_ difference
in sanely tracking upstream in a release and injecting potentially
massively unstable stuff in rawhide.

                                   -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux