On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Was very common, which is practically useless since it doesn't refer to > upstream or downstream bugzillas or feature list or changelog. Would it > be useful to introduce some guidelines to cover this? Well, %changelog should be only used for RPM changes, not for upstream ones. Something else seems abusing %changelog for me. Anyway most projects are delivering %doc ChangeLog, %doc Changes, %doc NEWS. Why is PackageKit not able to handle such things and to show that changelog or these news? The only thing looking reasonable to me, would be e.g. a a bugzilla number after the %changelog entry, which refers to that, but on the other hand why opening a bug report for each package update? Finally, I don't get your idea to do things twice. Instead of that, I really would like to see PackageKit reading Bodhi texts and not only the bug report numbers. I'm always using the text, I can enter in Bodhi for upstream and downstream changes. But they're only going to the mailing lists, not to the PackageKit user - and that's wrong and has to be changed ASAP. Maybe we can make a guideline for this to cover it... Greetings, Robert -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
