On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jack Tanner (ihok@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> You're concerned about the corner cases. I'm concerned about my use case. To >> say that "it won't ever work well" is wrong, since it works fine for me now. >> What you call "eliminating confusion" I call "throwing out the baby with the >> bathwater." > > Having never played with mpd, what's the specific usage case you're > looking for? (i.e., when X happens, the devices should be writable > by entity Y) mpd likely wants to install a rule that says "this device should *always* be accessible by this uid". Also, it should start pulse internally. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
