Bill Nottingham <notting <at> redhat.com> writes: > > How is positing a change in underlying, not-user-visible-at-all, system > infrastructure to a user's forum a worthwhile endeavor? After all, the > change to set sound device permissions from HAL was done years ago. It's still visible to this user. Even though sound device permissions are set through HAL *by default*, pam_console is still a perfectly serviceable alternative. Now, you're saying you want to take this alternative away. That places the onus on you to make this transition bearable. (I'm not arguing against hal/ck on technical merits, just their practical ease-of-use today.) > http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/hal-spec/hal-spec.html#access-control > > Examples are in /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor - look at > 00-thinkfinger.fdi, or 20-acl-management.fdi. It's not necessarily the > most well documented interface, but it should be stable. Wow. That's a lot of stuff to wade through. How about a tutorial, or a "cookbook"? I don't have a 00-thinkfinger.fdi, that's probably a Thinkpad-only file. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
