Re: pam_console

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jack Tanner wrote:
> It's still visible to this user. Even though sound device permissions are
> set through HAL *by default*, pam_console is still a perfectly serviceable
> alternative. Now, you're saying you want to take this alternative away.
> That places the onus on you to make this transition bearable. (I'm not
> arguing against hal/ck on technical merits, just their practical
> ease-of-use today.)

The point is that users shouldn't be murking with pam_console or HAL
permissions at all. They shouldn't have to. It's the packagers' job to make
the permissions be correct out of the box.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux