Re: Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Horst H. von Brand wrote:

It is only offtopic if fedora is never intended to be used by people
planning to move their work to RHEL and clones when the corresponding
release appears.  If that is a planned use case, then the discussion
belongs here.

"Move work" != "move all the distribution"

I've moved work from Fedora to CentOS, even from rawhide Fedora to
next-to-last CentOS, no big problem really.

So you weren't actually using any of the features that differentiate fedora?

Moving our servers from Fedora to CentOS required reinstall from scratch,
and porting some data from backups. Did take a lot of work, but was done
once.

Once = once per user.  A lot of work for every user.

If you need stability, go for RHEL or CentOS + EPEL. If you want a
technology preview, go for Fedora (even rawhide). If you need both at the
same time on the same machine...

Not both at the same time. A development cycle where the community input during development results in features that end up being usable.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux