Re: Usage of {_libdir} or {_lib} in noarch packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 19:24 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 09:46:49AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > 
> > With python, if one part of a module is arch specific, but the rest is
> > noarch, the entire bundle goes into the arch specific directory, which
> > could be /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 depending on the arch.  Python doesn't
> > allow parts of a module to be in one path (/usr/share) and the other
> > part be in an arch specific path (/usr/lib64).
> 
> Indeed, but even fully noarch modules go in /usr/lib instead of 
> /usr/share. 
> 
> It is fine for mixed arch/noarch to be in %_libdir, but noarch
> should be in %_datadir.

I wasn't arguing for/against that, just explaining what was meant by
keeping modules together.  I'm sure upstream would have a lovely
conversation about putting things in /usr/share/ 

Even more fun to do that for Perl.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux