On Saturday 20 December 2008 06:57:52 am Axel Thimm wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:50:37AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch > > > package requirements? > > > > What should it set it to? It has no knowledge of where the noarch rpm > > package will eventually be installed. Should we assume that /usr/lib is > > always correct (how Debian of me to even suggest this)? > > Isn't the norach equivalent of _libdir _datadir? Or phrased in another > way: Shouldn't a noach package avoid both lib and lib64? I think we > even have rules already set for this. > > I don't quite agree that rpm should start changing _libdir to point > to _datadir, but the packagers should probably patch up the packages > to use _datadir instead of _libdir if the package is indeed noarch. All python noarch libraries go in /usr/lib. -- Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
