On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 04:57:52PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Isn't the norach equivalent of _libdir _datadir? Or phrased in another > way: Shouldn't a noach package avoid both lib and lib64? I think we > even have rules already set for this. > > I don't quite agree that rpm should start changing _libdir to point > to _datadir, but the packagers should probably patch up the packages > to use _datadir instead of _libdir if the package is indeed noarch. I tend to agree. It would be interesting to scan alle noarch packages and see what they put in /usr/lib* and whether that's ok or not. B.t.w. I'm also against changing macros per target arch (as far as possible at all), this will make spec files even less "predictable". -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
