Re: Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emmanuel Seyman wrote:

> * Les Mikesell [22/12/2008 17:48] :
>>
>> OK, inform the users.  But if they observed the guidelines they wouldn't
>> be attempting any updates anyway, would they?
> 
> ???

The distro is EOL and gets no updates, so why would they attempt to update
it?

> Whatever happens, the packages done after official EOL will almost
> certaingly be of lesser quality than the ones pre-EOL.

So what? It's EOL, users still using it deserve whatever they get.

And I think pushing out security updates, even if they're completely
untested, would still be better than no updates at all.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux