Re: Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

> And I think pushing out security updates, even if they're completely
> untested, would still be better than no updates at all.

"Please don't make me move to a new set of packages" vs "dumping completely
untested packages that perhaps fix a security problem are OK"... something
sounds wrong here to me.

Also note that new developemt (and bug fixing, etc) in upstream projects
happens at the development tips (which there is usually only one), finding
and backporting security fixes only is a lot of work, and is /not/ trivial.
I'd say the risk of breakage (or bad or missed fixes) is a lot higher than
when just following upstream.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux