On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 02:07 +0000, Clive Messer wrote: > On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 10:39 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > We are way way way past constructive discussion. We were way past > > constructive discussion the moment Mark posted asking for a vote. > > Sure, the original call for a vote was not the best way of "discussing" > the behaviour, but the reality is that anyone wanting to see the default > changed in Fedora is wasting their time. A decision was made that > 'spatial' mode should be the default. That decision is not going to be > changed. There is no need for a discussion. Well, at least that is one > persons (my) opinion standing on the outside looking in. > > Regards > > Clive > > To quote the maintainer in this very thread: Yes, it is possible to have a discussion of what the defaults should be, but it should be a sane one with less emotions, no namecalling, a realization that someone else (who spent many many years working on the piece of software) may have a valid opinion, and a genuine interest in finding out the reasoning behind the various options. I have been convinced to change my mind by such discussions before, so I'm not just blocking other peoples ideas. Of course, your random rantings and namecallings don't exactly make me interested in having a discussion with you. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
