On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In general skip-broken is probably going to need to be the default for these > Yes, having skip-broken notify users of the problems its going to skip > over, and not silently skip would make me feel better. There will be a --skip-broken is borked, I used it the other day with the PackageKit problems, and skip-broken tried to pull in a bunch of .i386 deps (I don't have any .i386 rpms installed on my system). It did manage to skip the broken rpms, but it also tried to pull in a bunch of .i386 rpms as well which is obviously wrong. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
