Re: Making updates-testing more useful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In general skip-broken is probably going to need to be the default for these
Yes, having skip-broken notify users of the problems its going to skip
over, and not silently skip would make me feel better. There will be a

--skip-broken is borked, I used it the other day with the PackageKit
problems, and skip-broken tried to pull in a bunch of .i386 deps (I
don't have any .i386 rpms installed on my system).  It did manage to
skip the broken rpms, but it also tried to pull in a bunch of .i386
rpms as well which is obviously wrong.


I bet it is not wrong. the i386 packages probably provide what was required. They just provide it sub-optimally.

-sv

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux