Re: Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>  I don't want to get rid of "testing", I want to get rid of the hidden
> "package has been built but maintainer hasn't gotten around to push a
> package to testing" package queue and the interactions with it.
> 
> It's the interactive step maintainers are required to perform in bodhi
> to push a package to testing, which adding to this bureaucratic bloat
> maintainers in Fedora are confronted with.

This "bureaucracy" is needed so you can tell *why* you're pushing the
update. At the very least "upstream bugfix release, changelog here: [URL]".
But often you want to give a more precise reason, also referencing Bugzilla
IDs.

Now some maintainers don't do this, but that's their fault, not Bodhi's.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux