Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 17:52 +0100 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:08 +0100, Sven Lankes wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:58:51AM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > > > > >> We should try to get the bohdi-karma-mechanism more popular. > > > > > IMNSHO we should get rid of it -- there is already one very good > > > mechanism for registering bugs in the software and it is > > > bugzilla. > > > > Which can cater for negative feedback. I don't think most people would > > be too happy with bz-entries created just containing 'works for me'. > But this is exactly what is happening. > > Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475943 > for a real world case. Huh? This does not look like positive feedback to me but like a normal bug report. > ... no matter which karma a package would get, it would still be the > maintainer who overrules. +1. Let's get rid of karma automatism, at least no enabled by default. > > Ralf Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
