Re: Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 17:52 +0100 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:08 +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:58:51AM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > 
> > >> We should try to get the bohdi-karma-mechanism more popular. 
> >  
> > > IMNSHO we should get rid of it -- there is already one very good 
> > > mechanism for registering bugs in the software and it is 
> > > bugzilla.
> > 
> > Which can cater for negative feedback. I don't think most people would
> > be too happy with bz-entries created just containing 'works for me'.
> But this is exactly what is happening.
> 
> Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475943
> for a real world case.

Huh? This does not look like positive feedback to me but like a normal
bug report.

> ... no matter which karma a package would get, it would still be the
> maintainer who overrules.

+1. Let's get rid of karma automatism, at least no enabled by default.
> 
> Ralf

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux