Re: Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 16:40 +0100 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:27 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Matej Cepl wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2008-12-09, 12:03 GMT, Sven Lankes wrote:
> > >> We should try to get the bohdi-karma-mechanism more popular.
> > > 
> > > IMNSHO we should get rid of it
> 
> +1. It's superfluous.
> 
> >  -- there is already one very good
> > > mechanism for registering bugs in the software and it is
> > > bugzilla.
> Agreed. Bug reporters report success/failure through bugzilla.

How is this supposed to work? File a bug "your package works fine" each
and every time?

_If_ we wanted to use bugzilla to provide feedback it needs to be much
smarter, faster and more easy to use than now. And to be honest I have
no idea how to do that.

> > Bodhi feedback is a *complement* to bugzilla, not a replacement.
> 
> Feedback has nothing to do with "bodhi's karma counters".

It has, only nothing to do with automatically pushing updates based on
karma.

> 
> Ralf

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux