Jesse Keating wrote:
> To an extent, that's acceptable. Superfluous and gratuitous major
> version changes aren't. Also, there is a difference between doing 4.0
> to 4.1 and doing something like 3.5 to 4.1. I'm pretty sure you
> understand the spirit of what I'm pushing for, and aren't just trying to
> find fault in the specific words I've used (since every upstream is
> different and use numbers in different ways to express different
> things).
Well, I'm not sure I understood it and I'm also not sure the other people in
the discussion understood it.
I won't argue against the fact that an upgrade of the KDE 3->4 kind has no
business being in the update stream for a stable release, this seems
blatantly obvious to me. :-)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
