Arthur Pemberton wrote: > 2008/12/10 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>>>> Well, most of the active members of the Python SIG have chimed in on >>>>> this, and we're all channeling Frankie. >>>>> >>>>> Now, I do believe this is an important subject and we do need to gauge >>>>> the impact Python 3000 has on Fedora, but I believe that we are grossly >>>>> unequipped to do so at this time. I'd like to revisit this topic in >>>>> about a year (perhaps sooner, depending on circumstances), but for now >>>>> everyone just relax. >>>> >>>> Just to be clear, does that mean no Python 3.0 in parallel either? >>> How do you expect people to modify and test their own code without a >>> parallel install? >>> >> As stated multiple times, the initial port will be to python-2.6+ with >> python-3 features turned on. Then we'll see where we're at. >> >> It's possible that the remaining porting work will be small at that >> point and we can migrate easily. It's also possible that it's still a >> major undertaking to go from py-2.6 w/ python-3 features to py3. But we >> won't know until code starts being ported so there's no use trying to >> guess what we need to do now. >> >> -Toshio > > I think he meant "unofficial" work, as in not official porting of > packages. Just regular dev work. > Pretty much the same answer. Port to python-2.6 with python-3 features turned on. We don't, at this point, have enough information to tell if that's sufficient or not. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
