2008/12/10 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> >>>> Well, most of the active members of the Python SIG have chimed in on >>>> this, and we're all channeling Frankie. >>>> >>>> Now, I do believe this is an important subject and we do need to gauge >>>> the impact Python 3000 has on Fedora, but I believe that we are grossly >>>> unequipped to do so at this time. I'd like to revisit this topic in >>>> about a year (perhaps sooner, depending on circumstances), but for now >>>> everyone just relax. >>> >>> >>> Just to be clear, does that mean no Python 3.0 in parallel either? >> >> How do you expect people to modify and test their own code without a >> parallel install? >> > As stated multiple times, the initial port will be to python-2.6+ with > python-3 features turned on. Then we'll see where we're at. > > It's possible that the remaining porting work will be small at that > point and we can migrate easily. It's also possible that it's still a > major undertaking to go from py-2.6 w/ python-3 features to py3. But we > won't know until code starts being ported so there's no use trying to > guess what we need to do now. > > -Toshio I think he meant "unofficial" work, as in not official porting of packages. Just regular dev work. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
