On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:05 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > 2008/12/9 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>: > > So let me reiterate: > > > > * python-3.x will not be in Fedora-11 unless it becomes obvious in the > > next few weeks that we absolutely must be running it for the next release. > > * we need more experience with python-2.6+ & python-3 compatibility > > before we decide whether parallel versions of python are necessary. > > > > .. _[1]: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.txt > > > > -Toshio > > > Well again. Some people (like Toshio) seem to have a grasp on the > matter. All this banter hasn't produced anything more of use. How > about forming a temp SIG to take care of this trusting they do the > right thing? As opposed to the Python SIG that already exists? -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
