2008/12/9 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:05 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> 2008/12/9 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > So let me reiterate: >> > >> > * python-3.x will not be in Fedora-11 unless it becomes obvious in the >> > next few weeks that we absolutely must be running it for the next release. >> > * we need more experience with python-2.6+ & python-3 compatibility >> > before we decide whether parallel versions of python are necessary. >> > >> > .. _[1]: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.txt >> > >> > -Toshio >> >> >> Well again. Some people (like Toshio) seem to have a grasp on the >> matter. All this banter hasn't produced anything more of use. How >> about forming a temp SIG to take care of this trusting they do the >> right thing? > > As opposed to the Python SIG that already exists? No. Seems like the ideal body to come to a decision and let the rest of us know. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
