Re: The looming Python 3(000) monster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/12/9 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:05 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> 2008/12/9 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > So let me reiterate:
>> >
>> > * python-3.x will not be in Fedora-11 unless it becomes obvious in the
>> > next few weeks that we absolutely must be running it for the next release.
>> > * we need more experience with python-2.6+ & python-3 compatibility
>> > before we decide whether parallel versions of python are necessary.
>> >
>> > .. _[1]: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.txt
>> >
>> > -Toshio
>>
>>
>> Well again. Some people (like Toshio) seem to have a grasp on the
>> matter. All this banter hasn't produced anything more of use. How
>> about forming a temp SIG to take care of this trusting they do the
>> right thing?
>
> As opposed to the Python SIG that already exists?

No. Seems like the ideal body to come to a decision and let the rest
of us know.


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux