On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:05:27 -0900, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hmmm......I like that. However that would still require having people > consume updates-testing and reporting in bodhi. Do we have enough > people doing that? Do we have a good picture of how many are consuming > testing right now? If we got a ratio of the number of ips in the > mirrormanager logs for updates-testing to updates-stable in say the > last week of F9 mirrormanager activity we'd have a baseline > understanding of the percentage of the base which is consuming > testing. I have updates-testing enabled but I am not typically going to notice changes there unless something breaks. So you'll only get negative feedback, not positive feedback via that route. For packages that I am really interested in looking for changes in (for say fixes to bugs I have reported), updates-testing is way too slow. I just keep an eye on koji and pull updates from there when they show up for what I am interested in and feedback typically goes into bugzilla. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
