On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:30:55 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 23:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > I think I've seen %_exec_prefix/%_target before (I can imagine that trying > > > to change that might result in symlink-hell), but a root-level directory > > > is strange. That one is also "established practice"? > GCC uses $PREFIX/$TARGET for cross-toolchains. > > So, if a cross-toolchain uses --target=spu these files land in /usr/spu > > Whether using --target=spu is a clever idea and whether this makes sense > is a different matter. IMNSHO, it is none of both. > > > The top-level /spu (not in /usr) is weird indeed, I'm not sure where this > > comes from. > /spu is nonsense. I'd suggest to have FESCO block and withdraw this > package. As pointed out in another message, only /usr/spu remains currently. Though, there's an indication that temporarily some packages created bad paths unintentionally, because of broken RPM macro values in %files. This needs extra checks. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
