https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout | Fedora follows the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard with regards to | filesystem layout. The FHS defines where files should be placed on the | system. Fedora packages should follow the FHS whenever possible. Any | deviation from the FHS should be rationalized when the package is | reviewed. | | There is one notable exception, libexecdir. Contrary to that, package "spu-binutils" creates directories /spu /usr/spu which is a violation of the FHS. And I've been told there are more packages that do something similar. I'd like to propose that above guideline is updated with a "MUST" clause: The rationale for deviating from the FHS must be given in a comment in the package .spec file. Why is it not feasible to create an own tree like %{_libdir}/spu/ %{_libdir}/spu/bin/ ... ? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
