On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:58:29 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Contrary to that, package "spu-binutils" creates directories > > > > /spu > > /usr/spu > > > > which is a violation of the FHS. And I've been told there are more > > packages that do something similar. > > It's a cross-toolchain. I know. > Using a directory like this is the established > practice for GNU cross-toolchains (and also used by some other > cross-toolchains) and the consensus among Fedora packagers working on > cross-compilation is that this is the way to go. Unfortunately, the > guideline which was supposed to formally codify it never made it to an FPC > vote because of process issues. I think I've seen %_exec_prefix/%_target before (I can imagine that trying to change that might result in symlink-hell), but a root-level directory is strange. That one is also "established practice"? And this hasn't passed FPC and neither FESCo? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
