On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:58:29PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Contrary to that, package "spu-binutils" creates directories > > > > /spu > > /usr/spu > > > > which is a violation of the FHS. And I've been told there are more > > packages that do something similar. > > It's a cross-toolchain. Using a directory like this is the established > practice for GNU cross-toolchains (and also used by some other > cross-toolchains) and the consensus among Fedora packagers working on > cross-compilation is that this is the way to go. Unfortunately, the > guideline which was supposed to formally codify it never made it to an FPC > vote because of process issues. MinGW uses /usr/i686-pc-mingw32. I don't really like it, but it's what gcc wants to use, and everything depends on it. We also formally had the use of this path approved (just for mingw32-* packages) by FPC. Rich. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
