On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 20:11 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:10 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management > > > > (too verbose) > > > > > > I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better summary > > > instead of above, because imho it is a useful information that it is a > > > daemon and uses DBUS. > > > > Right, framework just sounded a more complete word than daemon. Maybe > > "Package management service" might be a better name. > > How about "DBUS-based package management service"? Is the fact that it uses D-Bus *really* that important to an end user to warrant putting it in the summary? -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
