On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:10 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management > > > (too verbose) > > > > I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better summary > > instead of above, because imho it is a useful information that it is a > > daemon and uses DBUS. > > Right, framework just sounded a more complete word than daemon. Maybe > "Package management service" might be a better name. How about "DBUS-based package management service"? > > Also all the differen summaries for media players above do not really > > provide much information that allows to distinguish them, e.g. is the > > gstreamer based media player or the player from Mozilla not feature rich > > or customizable? I don't know, but the summary does not really help here. > > I don't think it matters; the user will click on it and read the > description if they are that interested. If one uses "yum search", then there is no easy clicking. Also it is imho a better user experience, if the different players are easier to distinguish with a GUI, if they all have more or less only the information "this is an media player", it would be probably better to only display a category summary for them on the GUI. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
