On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:10 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management > > (too verbose) > > I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better summary > instead of above, because imho it is a useful information that it is a daemon > and uses DBUS. Right, framework just sounded a more complete word than daemon. Maybe "Package management service" might be a better name. > > * XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C > > (repeating the program name) > > In contradiction to above, the reworked summary for this still contains all > the information. Here the alternative is a good improvement. Right. > Also all the differen summaries for media players above do not really provide > much information that allows to distinguish them, e.g. is the gstreamer based > media player or the player from Mozilla not feature rich or customizable? I > don't know, but the summary does not really help here. I don't think it matters; the user will click on it and read the description if they are that interested. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
