On Fri November 21 2008, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 20:11 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:10 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package > > > > > management (too verbose) > > > > > > > > I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better > > > > summary instead of above, because imho it is a useful information > > > > that it is a daemon and uses DBUS. > > > > > > Right, framework just sounded a more complete word than daemon. Maybe > > > "Package management service" might be a better name. > > > > How about "DBUS-based package management service"? > > Is the fact that it uses D-Bus *really* that important to an end user to > warrant putting it in the summary? It is the only fact I know about it that makes it special. I do not really know what it does, but as far as I understand it is like yum-cron, except that it triggers an action not periodically but via an dbus-event, e.g. when the yum metadata was refreshed or when the system got network access. But I do not really know which package is it, but this is what I experienced on live systems and it seems to match the description. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
