On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 15:35 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote: > James Antill wrote: > > > > 1. Too many people want to be consumers of the testing but not the > > providers of it. > > Indeed IMO the whole updates-tested argument seems to devolve to "I'm > > going to be clever and switch to this, but I'm pretty sure a bunch of > > other people aren't going to know immediately and so will become my > > unwilling testers". > > > One of Fedora's goals is to turn users into contributors. What better > way to do that than to make every default-retaining user an unwitting > brick in a colossal meat wall? If you want to ask Jesse to enable updates-testing by default, feel free to do so. It's certainly better in many ways than creating an updates-tested repo. However I think there is a big difference between wanting people to opt-in to contributions and doing it for them. -- James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list