On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 23:14 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > So what about the risk-factor rating concept? Suppose users had an > option that would ignore updates for about a week, then take them if > there were no new bugzilla reports, longer if there were, with > everything in one repo and some override options for special > circumstances? 3rd party repos could match the technique or not. > Updates or installs of new packages that would pull dependencies higher > than your acceptable risk factor could just fail. That makes it somewhat easier infrastructure wise, would be interesting to see what kind of states that would leave a user in. Whip up a yum plugin and see what happens. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
