Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 18:11 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
But, you either need an intermediate repository with
things moved on to the safer one at some point,
You mean like updates-testing ?
Slightly different. More like updates and updates-tested. Something
you might opt-into after your machine was working the way you want and
you don't want to take unnecessary chances. But it might be even better
to have some sort of per-package risk rating that would go down with age
unless problems were reported and a per-client choice of how
bleeding-edge to go. And packages being pushed to fix security or
serious known problems could be added with a negative risk rating if the
packager is sure that it will make things better instead of worse.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
