On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 23:07 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > On 22.7.2020 20:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I do not see the benefit of using timesyncd over chrony. Arguably, > > chrony is a much better implementation and having a consistent time > > server choice across all variants makes life considerably easier for > > integration and management. > > ? > > Timesyncd has a smaller foot-print and lower resource requirements, is > part of the system management framework ( already installed ) and serves > I would say majority of usecases out there which makes it a better > distribution default since today distributions need to cater the entire > spectrum ( embedded,cloud, containers, servers, desktop etc. ) and I > think you are mistaken if you think that chrony is being used across all > variants in Fedora ( I suspect that is an exception rather than a rule > these days ). It's in at least the Cloud base image, KDE live install, Server DVD install, Silverblue DVD install and Workstation live install. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
