Re: Multiple Fedora Desktop edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 15:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:11 PM Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 11:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Is is possible there's a significant minority who have workflows that
> > > explicitly depend on chrony? If it's not possible, then I'd support
> > > the working group just making the substitution for Workstation 33.
> > 
> > We literally just got done rewriting
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_service_manipulation
> > (and the automated version of that test) to use chronyd on the basis
> > that it's a reliable service that we can rely on to exist in all tested
> > editions :/
> 
> Find and replace? :D
> 
> @core services
> dnf-makecache.timer
> auditd.service
> plymouth-start.service
> 
> chrony isn't in either @core or @standard groups. It's in
> server-product and workstation-product (anaconda-tools and
> system-tools). But it may not be in Cloud, IoT, or CoreOS. I'm not
> sure.

It's in everything we run the test on. We checked.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux