On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:46 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:04 AM Michel Alexandre Salim > <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 10:43 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:37 AM Michael Catanzaro < > > > mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think a change to remove chronyd in favor of timesyncd might be > > > > accepted for Workstation. > > > > > > It's much simpler. Off hand I can't think of what Workstation would > > > be > > > missing out on. > > > > > That would bring us in line with Ubuntu, so - given that Fedora likely > > has a newer systemd than Ubuntu (e.g. Ubuntu 20.04 only has systemd > > 245.4, F32 has 245.6) -- if it works for them, and has been working for > > several releases, it could be worth a Change proposal for F34. > > > > Wearing my sysadmin hat, this would simplify our logic for configuring > > NTP clients quite a bit, as basically most of our Linux clients would > > then be on timesyncd (we try to stick to the distro default but just > > override the config). > > Is is possible there's a significant minority who have workflows that > explicitly depend on chrony? If it's not possible, then I'd support > the working group just making the substitution for Workstation 33. > I do not see the benefit of using timesyncd over chrony. Arguably, chrony is a much better implementation and having a consistent time server choice across all variants makes life considerably easier for integration and management. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
