On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:25 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 13-09-18 16:16, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 10:06 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > This needs to be disabled in systemd, as I mentioned in the > > > previous > > > thread. > > > This means it would still work in GNOME if somebody enables the > > > feature > > > in systemd, as would be expected. > > > > Yeah, I agree that disabling it in systemd by default is likely the > > best way forward for F29. If we can get enough testing, then it may > > be > > possible to enable hibernation again for F30. > > > > gsd-power has no configuration option to change the behaviour. It > > will > > simply use SuspendThenHibernate rather than Suspend when the method > > is > > available. > > My reaction to Bastien and yours crossed, right gsd-power has no > configuration option now. What I'm suggesting is, that since some people > want this to be opt-in, we add such a configuration option. > > This really is a policy decision and as such belongs in GNOME IMHO > systemd simply provides a mechanism for this and the availability > call it has is to indicate if the hardware can support this at all > (with no guarantees about this working). I do see how this is a policy decision in a way. However, the main reason for me to *not* enable suspend-then-hibernate is that we consider hibernation to be unstable/unsupported in the first place. And if we consider hibernate non-functional, then it could be sane to disable hibernation in the first place. That said, we are hitting this issue only because the feature was added to systemd and gnome-settings-daemon and also enabled by default. Adding an option to gnome-settings-daemon, would be a functional workaround and would also allow users to easily enable it for testing purposes. So, Hans' suggestion to add a gsd-power option may actually be the best solution. I think that being able make it easily configurable by users is the main advantage of this approach. > Either way we need to do something about this for F29. Agreed. Benjamin _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
