On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:16 +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 10:06 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > This needs to be disabled in systemd, as I mentioned in the previous > > thread. > > This means it would still work in GNOME if somebody enables the feature > > in systemd, as would be expected. > > Yeah, I agree that disabling it in systemd by default is likely the > best way forward for F29. If we can get enough testing, then it may be > possible to enable hibernation again for F30. > > gsd-power has no configuration option to change the behaviour. It will > simply use SuspendThenHibernate rather than Suspend when the method is > available. Continuing the slight tangent from earlier - why was this preferred to hybrid-sleep, given that systemd apparently implements hybrid-sleep? Off the top of my head I can think of only one tiny benefit of suspend- then-hibernate over hybrid-sleep: after 3 hours it doesn't drain the battery at all any more. Is that really a big enough benefit to outweigh the drawback of *always* requiring the slower, much-more- likely-to-fail 'resume-from-hibernation' behaviour after 3 hours or more? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
