Re: User's Feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




----- Original Message -----
> Bastien Nocera píše v St 03. 05. 2017 v 05:05 -0400:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hi,
> > > last week I asked on my Czech blog what people are missing on the
> > > Linux
> > > desktop, mainly Fedora Workstation. It was picked by all major
> > > Czech
> > > Linux sites and received literally hundreds of responses. I went
> > > through them and created a summary for you. Some of it are well-
> > > known
> > > issues/features, some points were new to me. If something is not
> > > clear,
> > > just let me know and I'll be happy to explain it:
> > 
> > This kind of mega bug list is really unactionable. Somebody needs to
> > take all the feedback, review it, and then start *separate*
> > discussions
> > about specific items.
> > 
> > There's a bunch of items in there that are plain bugs, and a few that
> > make no sense because they ask for things that already exist[1].
> > Reviewing and removing those items would shrink the apparent task,
> > and
> > avoid megathreads where nothing much ends up happening.
> 
> It was not meant to be an actionable list, I just wanted to share what
> users see as the main pain points.
> I've already filed a couple of bugs about those problems and am making
> action items for problems in components my team is responsible for. If
> I have time, I'll try to process the rest into actionable items, too.
> 
> > [1]: There's been a GSettings key for disabling animations for at
> > least
> > 7 years, there probably was a GConf one for 10 years before that too.
> 
> Well, then it's a problem of discoverability. People just don't know
> about this key and they rather use an extension (Inpatient). I think
> running Fedora Workstation on an older computer is enough common to
> have it at least in the Tweak Tool.

It's already in gnome-tweak-tool as mentioned in another mail, but more
importantly it will make no difference to the machine's performance. You
could apply snake oil and disable the animations.

The GNOME Events box machines are respectively 7 and 10 years now, I believe
(see the section at the bottom: http://www.hadess.net/2015/04/jdll-2015.html)

Both machines are capable of running GNOME, playing videos, and launching
multiple applications at the same time. The only things that make a difference
are the amount of RAM in the machine, so we can open multiple applications
without swapping, and whether the storage device is a spinning hard disk, or
a faster Flash drive.

Being able to disable animations could still be an accessibility setting,
but it will have no impact on people's ability to run GNOME and applications
on older machines.

In fact, I'd go as far as saying that the animations not being smooth should
be considered a bug. That'd mean synchronous I/O in mutter, or a horrible
block I/O scheduler in the Linux kernel.
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux