El 21-07-2016 11:07, Bastien Nocera escribió:
No, it means that we don't show things that:
1) don't match use cases we're interested in
2) are work-arounds for particular use cases instead of properly
designed fixes
3) are necessary for deployments, but not for individual users
If you think there are settings that are in gnome-tweak-tool should be
available
in the main Settings panel, file a bug against gnome-control-center
upstream,
and we'll consider it (if it hasn't already been).
GNOME is the default DE in fedora workstation and is the desktop
environment that display the more basic energy options and does not
allow dynamic configuration. For example, the only option to distinguish
between a device with or without a battery is the suspension system.
Moreover, several development cycles ago, there are no notifications
power status (AC, battery charged, battery critical load, etc.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747887 that are basic to a
user on the desktop and are only available by editing upower settings.
Also to enable battery percentage display must go to dconf-editor. -_-'
We don't insult our users' intelligence, we just don't show settings
that only
benefit a very small minority of our users, especially when that very
small minority
I still remember the resistance GNOME team not to include energy options
to close the lid of the laptop, luckily we now have the option to tweak
tool ...
Office runner was it a solution? I do not believe it.
is part of the existing Fedora and GNOME users that already know about
the "TweakUI"
tools available.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
