Re: Upgrades to F24 via dnf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 10:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm a bit late to this thread, but to me the duplication of @fedora-
> workstation and @gnome-desktop is dumb and needs to go away.
> @^workstat
> ion-product-environment (the env group) should use one package group
> as
> 'all the main GNOME desktop packages' and anything Workstation-y
> should
> include the the env group, anything just GNOME-y can include the
> package group.
> 
> I think we went over this on IRC, but I am rather suspicious of the
> original "bug". If the system has the workstation-product-environment
> env group installed, so long as the real package group is part of
> that
> env, stuff shouldn't get removed on a dnf upgrade. If it does, that's
> a
> clear bug in dnf, but I don't think it actually does. The "bug" in
> question does not actually appear to have been reported anywhere we
> could find.

Pete, do you have any comment on this? Otherwise I'm planning to roll
this change back in later this week.

Michael
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux