On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 10:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > This isn't the problem. We have the Fedora Workstation environment group for > that purpose. Environment groups contain package groups. Both > @fedora-workstation and @gnome-desktop are package groups. > > So there's an argument to be made that perhaps @fedora-workstation should go > away and be replaced by @^workstation-product-environment entirely. I'm a bit late to this thread, but to me the duplication of @fedora- workstation and @gnome-desktop is dumb and needs to go away. @^workstat ion-product-environment (the env group) should use one package group as 'all the main GNOME desktop packages' and anything Workstation-y should include the the env group, anything just GNOME-y can include the package group. I think we went over this on IRC, but I am rather suspicious of the original "bug". If the system has the workstation-product-environment env group installed, so long as the real package group is part of that env, stuff shouldn't get removed on a dnf upgrade. If it does, that's a clear bug in dnf, but I don't think it actually does. The "bug" in question does not actually appear to have been reported anywhere we could find. -- Adam WilliamsonFedora QA Community MonkeyIRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . nethttp://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
