On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:38:11AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > >>2) The Design Suite is going to either (a) drop darktable (b) be dropped > >>itself (c) massively overhauled to become a Fedora Remix. > >> > >>3) Still don't understand the F23 experience of installing darktable. > >> > >>In terms of user experience, this simply sucks and makes me feel like > >>slavish adherence to obscure packaging rules is more important than our user > >>base. > > > > On 09/10/2015 10:27 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >/me catches up with thread > > > >I'm not sure if 2(c) is necessary, if we have disabled repo support, > >but I don't understand how that works with the upgrade process. Need > >moar clue? > > A lot of us use design-suite as a package group and not a live image. My > (perhaps flawed assumption) is that the disabled repo support wouldn't help > in this case as darktable couldn't be included in the package group being > from a different physical repo? > > In the context of using design-suite as a package group... is there a way > forward without doing it as a remix in a separate repo from the main fedora > repos? You're right -- the design-suite composition was not something I was factoring in. Overtaken By Events now (see earlier update to list), but thanks for raising good points. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
